Refractive Error Quality Of Life
Rasch Measure Trans. 1992;6(3)238.27SmithEV, Jr. Krishna Kumar Ramani Elite School of Optometry No. 8, G.S.T. All Rights Reserved. × Sign in to access your subscriptions Sign in to your personal account Institutional sign in: OpenAthens | Shibboleth Create a free personal account to download free article Forty-eight percent (n = 13) of the children had simple myopia, 22% (n = 6) had compound myopia, 11% (n = 3) had compound hyperopia, and 19% (n = 5) had http://pubtz.com/refractive-error/refractive-error-367-9.php
One child candidly said that he dislikes wearing spectacles and used to break them often. “While playing volley ball, I will be afraid that the ball may hit my specs and Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14(1)25–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]15WongT, ChongE, WongW, et al. Although many teachers agreed that there is an improvement in a child’s performance after refractive correction, some teachers felt that there was not much difference in performance but an improvement in ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved The following error was encountered while trying to retrieve the URL: http://0.0.0.10/ Connection to 0.0.0.10 failed. https://nei.nih.gov/faqs/resources-neis-refractive-error-quality-life-instrument-nei-rql-42
The positive score suggests that the participants’ level of functioning was higher than the mean required level of difficulty for the items. Although most ECPs believed that refractive correction improves the QoL of children, a few stated that it may just have a “placebo” effect, especially in cases of mild visual impairment (visual The NEI-RQL-42 and RSVP showed similar construct validity in terms of refractive error discrimination, but the NEI-RQL-42 showed better construct validity when discriminating by the type of refractive correction used by Aung, None, P.
Nichols, OD, MS, MPH, College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 320 W 10th Ave, PO Box 182342, Columbus, OH 43218(e-mail: [email protected]). We’ll play hide and seek and all those things. These findings of the present study may explain the poor spectacle compliance and acceptance among schoolchildren, demonstrated by Li et al.8 and Castanon Holguin et al.14 In addition, the current study Being teased, being called by names, and being mocked by friends for wearing spectacles were stated as major issues.
Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB, Munoz SR, Pokharel GP, Sanga L, Bachani D. Assessing the minimally clinically significant difference: scientific considerations, challenges and solutions. They also expressed that playing outdoor games with spectacles on was uncomfortable, which led to embarrassment by friends. “I was happy and enjoyed when I wore the specs for the first Table 2. View Table Participants with Myopia, Hyperopia, and Emmetropia (Corrected and Uncorrected), Stratified for the Parameters ShownTable 2. Participants with Myopia, Hyperopia, and Emmetropia (Corrected and Uncorrected), Stratified for the Parameters Shown Corrected
A major limitation common to most studies on visual functioning or QoL has been the use of a mean or summary score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(2)528–533. [CrossRef] [PubMed]14FoongAW, SawSM, LooJL, et al. The only subscale for which the mean scores significantly differed between visits was the RSVP symptoms subscale; the mean of this subscale was 11.6 ± 9.9 and the mean difference between Wong; The Impact of Corrected and Uncorrected Refractive Error on Visual Functioning: The Singapore Malay Eye Study.
Remember me What does "Remember me" mean? http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2126119 The ECPs hypothesized “poor eye-hand co-ordination and fear of being hurt while playing” as the reasons for avoidance of outdoor games. The teachers were identified from the schools in which the screening program was conducted. The internal consistency of the NEI-RQL-42 subscales was generally good.
Noncycloplegic, subjective refractions and high-contrast visual acuity assessments were also performed. have a peek at these guys The study was conducted with adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki, and it was approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee of Vision Research Foundation, Chennai. This was true for the overall NEI-RQL-42 score, but not the overall RSVP score, using a conservative α of .01. methods.
Therefore, it remains unclear whether the QoL of children is affected irrespective of the type and amount of refractive error they have and whether the prescribed spectacles make a meaningful difference Optimum correction, clear vision, symptomatic relief, good cosmetic appearance of spectacles, lightweight lenses, and motivation from parents and friends were quoted as reasons for good compliance. They described the problems faced by children who lost or forgot to wear spectacles and behaviors of children before and after refractive correction. check over here Many children with URE admitted that their academic performance was only average and related it to their vision-related problems.
Researchers emphasize that health-related QoL assessment provides valuable information about the different aspects of health of the child and could improve clinical management, by optimizing therapeutic strategies and identifying effective treatment.10 A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets. After the removal of these participants, 1112 participants remained.
Mitchell, None, T.Y.
Some ECPs felt that children with URE may not articulate or express all the difficulties they face, as they might think what they see is normal or cope up with their The driving subscale had a very high internal consistency; the items in this subscale might be considered redundant. Visual acuity was then measured at 4 m using the protocol similar to that of the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study.12- 14 High-contrast, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual Please ensure Cookies are turned on and then re-visit the desired page.
Cited Here... | PubMed2. In a previous report, emmetropic patients scored significantly better than myopic patients on 12 subscales and better than hyperopic patients on all 13 subscales.19 On the RSVP, 3 subscales showed differences, Wee, None, T. this content It used to pain a lot while seeing computer or TV for long time.
The fit statistics of the remaining nine items were found to be consistent with the Rasch model requirements. The Qualitative Report 2002; 7 (1). Likewise, the test-retest reliability for the overall NEI-RQL-42 was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.91; 95% limits of agreement, −9.1 to 10.1); and for the RSVP, fair (ICC, 0.76; 95% limits The current study also revealed that psychological issues like being embarrassed or teased by peers are experienced mostly by children after refractive correction.
Alert me when new content is published. An overall item–trait interaction score (χ2) with a statistically nonsignificant probability (P > 0.05) indicates fit to the model and that hierarchical ordering of the items (i.e., from difficult to easy) It attempts to elicit understanding in the form of thick descriptions of the problems faced by the child functionally and in relation to their environment. The FGD guide was refined by expert opinions and was tested for efficiency with mock discussions.
Ophthalmology. 2004;111(6)1161–1168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]18LamoureuxEL, ChongE, ThumbooJ, et al. Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. However, most of the items in the instrument targeted only the QoL issues related to visual functions. Importance of affordable eye care.
As seen in this sample of patients with a limited range of scores, floor or ceiling effects may limit the utility of these instruments. Nassar-McMillan SC, Borders LD. It included 14 hyperopic patients (range, 3.94-0.50 diopters [D]), 26 emmetropic patients(range, 0.44 to −0.38 D), and 39 myopic patients (range, −0.63 to −11.19 D). Some ECPs and teachers shared that parents of some female children consciously hinder their child wearing glass with a feeling that she may be looked down in society. “We went for
Also shown are values obtained from a previous report.19 The RSVP also generally showed good internal consistency. Teachers were included in the study as they are the direct observers of the child at school and hence can provide information about their functioning and performance at school. View Images in Gallery Email to a Colleague Colleague's E-mail is Invalid Your Name: (optional) Your Email: Colleague's Email: Separate multiple e-mails with a (;). Children wearing refractive correction were able to recall their limitation to perform well in academics before spectacle wear. “I copy wrongly from the board and because of the mistakes I will
As a second measure of known-groups validity, both instruments were compared across the mode of refractive error correction shown in Table 5 (ie, spectacles, contact lenses, or neither). Overall, the participants’ mean age was 52.8 (±9.6) years, and there were marginally more women (600, 54%) than men. conclusions.